Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?

I totally disappeared from the face of Quora more than a year ago. And I reappear abruptly, out of thin air, talking about AI. Uncanny, isn’t it?

Calm down. It’s Sunny this side.

Meta-Learning = Learning about Learning

Broadcom CEO On VMware Renewals, VCF Customers And Tomahawk 6 - CRN Magazine

So, basically, for her to win the debate competition, she would need to prove that AI (tools like ChatGPT) does not hinder the art of creative thinking in humans.

Now it was up to her to perform well in the debate.

So I replied to her texts with this:

Frigid Exoplanet in Strange Orbit Imaged by NASA’s Webb - NASA Science (.gov)

Sunny Dhondkar

Just like Alexander the Great being tutored by Aristotle.

I can’t explain the joy that ran through my nerves seeing we were able to pull off such a heist.

What is the dirtiest thing you have witnessed your wife do?

Well, well, well.

Bruce Wayne (Batman) has a human moderator: Alfred.

I’m coming for you, humans.

New Apple study challenges whether AI models truly “reason” through problems - Ars Technica

That’s it. There isn’t much of a significant difference. Both superheroes work at the same creative level.

There’s an effective way to trap the opponents—by using our attacking argument as the defending argument—the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools. Using the same attacking and defending argument will trap the opponents by rendering them off of any additional points to counter.

Amanuenses: Many famous writers employed assistants responsible for taking dictation or copying manuscripts. For example, John Milton, who was blind, dictated his epic poem Paradise Lost to amanuenses, including his daughters.

Is the media protecting Kamala Harris?

Tony Stark (Iron Man) has an AI moderator: Jarvis.

A vizier obviously has more knowledge than the king. But it doesn’t make him more capable than the king. The vizier helps, but the king makes the call. Just like AI is more potent than a human, but it doesn’t make it the main element.

I sent this PDF to my follower and asked her to use the same conclusion points to conclude her debate:

New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Space

Now, concluding my answer to your question:

Although, this level of comparison isn’t totally valid right now because what we are dealing with currently is Generative Artificial Intelligence and not Artificial General Intelligence. There’s way more to go for us to reach that level.

This is what she replied with:

How did Trump's ear recover 100% from the "two centimeter wound" we were told of two weeks ago?

Meta-Discussion = Discussion about Discussion

Alright.

The thing is, ChatGPT existed in history—but in human form. People were creative back then because of a moderator in human form. Today, we don’t need a human moderator. Creativity will be maintained in the same way.

Is homosexuality an excommunicable offense in Christianity?

What if all of this is being written by an AI?

Alfred supports Batman on a personal and ethical level, whereas Jarvis is more of a technical and operational assistant for Iron Man.

ChatGPT will not make Quora (or any other platform) obsolete.

What ESPN’s Football Power Index is projecting for Big 12 rivals BYU and Utah in 2025 - Deseret News

Nah, I’m just kidding.

I collected every point I had discussed with her in Instagram DMs and fed those points to ChatGPT, asking it to lead them to a final conclusion. Furthermore, I asked it to create a PDF of the conclusion points and send it to me.

Before we proceed, you should be aware of the prefix Meta.

As a woman, what would be you response to a male friend’s offer of a full body massage?

To achieve feats that are greater than us, we need a greater level of assistance.

Is this AI as Sunny? Or Sunny as AI? Or just AI?

In ancient kingdoms, viziers were senior advisors to the king or emperor. They handled state affairs, offered counsel, and executed the ruler’s directives, much like a modern-day chief of staff.

Now, you’re about to experience a little heist we pulled.

Viziers:

Post Credits:

So the crazy little idea was to make the debate Meta.

Or was it?

The legendary works published by writers throughout history were crafted with the help of assistants. It’s just that AI solves the problem of hiring human assistants. Now we can have our own assistants for free (or for tiny subscription, coz… capitalism).

The other half? — It’s to counter the chess move put forward by the opponents.

ChatGPT is like Dr. Watson to Sherlock Holmes. Alfred to Batman. There’s even a software called Alfred for Mac systems. I personally use it. There’s a reason why it was named Alfred. It proves that in this modern world, you don’t need to be a billionaire like Bruce Wayne to have your personal butler.

Even if the greatest novel writers didn’t have ChatGPT back then, they did have somebody special around them who sparked ideas like a catalyst in a chemical reaction. But today, we don’t need to rely on another human for that. We can rely on Generative AI.

Alfred is Batman's butler, mentor, and moral compass. He provides emotional support, wisdom, and logistical help, acting as a human companion who ensures Bruce Wayne remains grounded. The relationship is deeply personal and rooted in trust and loyalty.

Examples:

Meta-Joke = A Joke about Jokes

This analogy summarizes my point best:

I would never use AI to write a Quora answer. I’ve got a different kind of attachment with Quora. Quora was the first platform I started creating content on. I’ve got a special corner for the people on Quora who have been reading my answers.

I was already occupied with a lot of work, but I had this crazy little idea that made me throw away everything else and glue myself to this moment.

So, I asked her to roughly formulate what the potential moves of her opponents might be.

Or is it?

Or am I?

So this answer was not written using AI.

Let’s make things even more meta.

Hahaha.

A couple of months ago, I received these texts from one of my followers on Instagram:

That’ll be done by bringing forth the historical term Amanuenses.

As you will see, this crazy little idea would help her win this debate competition against 20 other teams (even though she had less than 12 hours to prepare) and will also answer your question. So stay with me.

That’s by using AI to win the debate defending AI.

A sort of Meta-AI thing.

The next day, I received her text:

Well… now we’ve put forth our chess move. That’s half of what it takes to win a debate.

Another great historical reference would be that of Viziers.

But how does this meta-fication prove our point?

Well… No.

Meta-X = X about X

What if this answer itself was written by ChatGPT? What if I trained ChatGPT on all of my Quora answers and taught it my language, tone, and way of writing?

Jarvis (Just A Rather Very Intelligent System) is an artificial intelligence that assists Tony Stark (Iron Man) with a wide range of tasks, from managing his suits to offering tactical advice. Jarvis represents advanced technology, providing efficient, data-driven assistance without emotional nuance.

It’s by showing the symbiotic relationship we have with AI tools like ChatGPT. Tools like these cannot think for you. You have to do the thinking. Then communicate with these tools. Then the tools will behave like your assistants.

Generative AI is just autocorrect on steroids. To put it simply, its main job is to predict the next word. That’s it. Although it does that thing so brilliantly that it helps us create stuff, there’s no way it would make Quora or any other creative platform or job obsolete. It’ll just reduce the labor work that doesn’t require creativity. So, if your job is pure labor and doesn’t require you to be creative, AI will probably make it obsolete. It’s always better to switch to being creative. Not only would it be engaging and healthy for your brain, but you also wouldn’t feel threatened to lose your job.